Well then, today has been interesting hasn't it?  Rafer Alston is out and Chris Quinn is in.  Quinn is a nice shooter, and has a phenomenal NBA.com picture.  I think that this is a precursor to another move, so hang in there.

Also wanted to touch on Rafer Alston real quick.  I thought he was a good fit here, but obviously I was wrong.  He dribbled the ball too much and shot too much.  Plus I still have no idea what he was yelling at the bench that one game, but it does seem like he was trying to be a good teammate throughout, so I wish him the best.

As for tonight, I think that the Nets should be able to get a W if they can play the same way they have been playing for the past two games.  Oh and Jarvis Hayes is back, Boone and Najera are out, but day-to-day.

Devin Harris vs. Brandon Jennings

This is the match-up everybody wanted to see the first game these two teams matched up.  Both of these guys are the new breed of scoring PG, using their speed to get into the lane and cause a lot of problems for the opposition.  Maybe going up against Brandon Jennings will get Devin going.

Advantage:  Devin Harris

Courtney Lee vs. Michael Redd

Michael Redd is a terrific shooter and he has been playing well the last couple of games.  Courtney Lee has been the opposite of a terrific shooter this year, but Courtney has been doing everything else great.  If you want something to watch during this match-up, check out Lee defending Redd.  Lee is a great defender, so that should be fun to see.

Advantage:  Michael Redd

Chris Douglas-Roberts vs. Luc Richard Mbah a Moute

Luc was out the last time CDR played the Bucks, a game where CDR put up 31 points, so you might not want to expect a repeat performance.  Luc is a biggish 3 who can play strong defense and contribute when necessary on the offensive end.  I think CDR will have another 20+ game though.

Advantage:  CDR

Yi vs. Ersan Ilyasova

Jeremy from Bucksketball.com (Truehoop Network's Bucks' Blog) has a pretty interesting take on Yi:

One of the great fears many Bucks fans have is that Easy Yi will one day go on to live up to the vast potential he has, scarring us for life and making us forever rue the day he was given up for what practically amounted to one season of Richard Jefferson. In his last five games, Yi has averaged 20 points and seven rebounds while shooting just a shade under 50 percent.  When he was drafted it was expected those types of performances would be common place for Yi, but he did so little in his one year with Milwaukee that he hardly seemed a better prospect than Charlie Villanueva.  Regardless, he’s looked good lately and that has everyone on watch in Milwaukee, even if it probably wouldn’t have happened here.

Advantage:  Yi

Brook Lopez vs. Andrew Bogut

Bogut got the better of Brook the first match-up, but I think that was before the Nets decided to focus on getting him the ball.  The Nets now have a couple of quick hitting plays they can use to get Brook the ball with good position in the post.  Look for him to put up a 20 and 10.

Advantage:  Brook Lopez

 

Yeah, so this is starting to get more and more interesting.  From Adrian's twitter:

Miami has agreed to send Chris Quinn to Nets for future 2nd and cash to free roster spot and will sign Rafer Alston, sources say.

From Al Iannazzone:

The Nets are going to buy out Rafer Alston’s $5.25 million contract for roughly $4 million and in a separate move are going to acquire Chris Quinn, Miami’s second round pick in 2012 and cash for a trade exception, league sources said.

When Alston clears waivers the Heat are expected to be the frontrunners for his services.

So Chris Quinn is a good shooter who can play some point.  Will the Nets keep him?  No clue, Adrian's tweet makes it sound like the Heat are sending money to free up Quinn's spot, but Al seems to think we are keeping Quinn.  Either way, the Nets add another pick, and you can't complain about that.

 

The Nets end their homestand tonight with the Milwaukee Bucks, so we are going to treat you with the final (for now) Bloggers Talk by chatting with Jeremy Schmidt from the TrueHoop Bucks site, Bucksetball.

NAS: After a surprise start, the Milwaukee Bucks seem to be falling to the back of the pack in the East. What are your theories about the decline, and do the Bucks have the personnel to turn it around?

I watch every single Bucks game and I still can't tell you whether or not the Bucks have the personnel to pull themselves out of the 5-15 tailspin they're currently mired in.  They don't really have anyone on the team that can be expected to score 20 points a night, or even 15.  There have been too many wild inconsistent swings on this team and not just from the role players.  Andrew Bogut can finish one game 14-18 and then shoot 6-20 the next night.  That's the life of a big man with a finesse game, but not 15-foot jump-shot.  Brandon Jennings hasn't consistently made many shots since his quick start and has settled in as an under 40 percent playmaker, though he can occasionally carry the team for short spurts.  And Michael Redd?  Sigh.  Who knows about him.

NAS: This could be related to question one. Does Michael Redd still have a role on this team?

Coach Scott Skiles is always saying all the Bucks need Redd to do is make open shots.  Well, he hasn't really been doing much of that, shooting 35 percent and less than 30 percent on three's.  Redd's said that he's not in basketball shape yet, and the only way he'll get there is by playing, but he's generally been more terrible than good when he's been playing.  But the Bucks don't really have any other scoring options.  Redd's been a consistent scorer for the last six years and has offensive talents that no other Buck has.  At least, we all assume that he still does, because there have been some games where we've seen flashes of those talents.  Whether he'll be able to stop flashing them and start using them consistently any time soon remains to be seen.  Regardless, the Bucks are probably stuck with him, so they'll have to keep trotting him out there hoping he figures it out.

NAS: Given their roster makeup, are the Bucks better off making a deal and competing for one of the bottom seeds in the Eastern Conference or taking their chances in the draft lottery?

I'm not sure a deal is necessary for the Bucks to grab a bottom two seed in the Eastern Conference playoff race.  The franchise has placed a lot of importance on attempting to make the playoffs this year while not taking on any additional money for 2010 and beyond, so I don't see them making any deals unless it's for expiring contracts.  Everyone wants them to make the playoffs.  It's hard to develop talent in losing situations, guys want to see some kind of light at the end of the tunnel sooner rather than later.  So I think the playoffs are the first goal.  That being said, the Bucks have movable pieces should they decide the playoffs are out of the question would be the expiring contracts of Luke Ridnour, Kurt Thomas, Hakim Warrick and the 2011 expiring Michael Redd.  If the Bucks want to sell come trading deadline, they have some pieces playoff teams could be interested in for depth purposes.

NAS: Make the early case for Brandon Jennings winning the Rookie of the Year award:

I'll be honest, Tyreke Evans is nuts.  He's 20-5-5 every night and that's not easy to do.  Jennings' Bucks might be closer to a playoff spot, but that's really just because the East is watered down.  If Jennings can start hitting shots again, he could make it interesting, but it's tough to make the case right now.  That all being said, for a 6'1 160 pound point guard that didn't go to college and supposedly couldn't shoot, Jennings is doing just fine for himself.  19 points and six assists is nothing to sneeze at, especially when he's playing the most difficult position to learn in the league.

 

From Adrian Wojnarowski's twitterpage:

Rafer Alston has agreed to a contract buyout with Nets, and Heat and Cavs lead list of possible suitors for free agent, sources tell Y!

Remember that post Mark did this morning, and how a lot of those rumors had to do with a roster spot getting open?  Well here is that spot kids, look for more action to be coming in the near future.

I am assuming this to be true as Wojnarowski is usually spot on with everything.  The Rafer experiment didn't really work out, and I can see Rod and Kiki buying him out because they couldn't get anything on the trade market.

Update #1: It is being reported by Adrian as official.

Update #2: Dave D chimes in with a quote from Rafer's agent -

“We’ve reached an agreement in principle regarding a buyout for Rafer,” agent Dan Fegan said in a phone conversation.

 

The Nets have been getting killed on the boards.  A lot of it has to do with offensive rebounding, and the Nets allowing their opponents to do it too much.

 

In the past week, a number of sources have reported that the Nets have been testing the trade market by offering some of their expiring contracts. First, there was the Nate Robinson/Darko Milicic for Rafer Alston/Tony Battie trade proposal, tweeted by Yahoo's Adrian Wojnarowski this past weekend. Then yesterday, in an ESPN chat, Chris Sheridan suggested that the Nets were "peddling" guys like Battie, Bobby Simmons, Josh Boone and Eduardo Najera. Sheridan speculated a possible match with the Charlotte Bobcats in exchange for PF Boris Diaw, but he never says such a trade was ever floated by either team. Beat writer Al Iannazzone also speculated that Alston's name will likely be connected in more trade talk considering how his playing time has been dramatically reduced despite coach Kiki Vandeweghe saying the erratic PG "deserved to play."

Earlier this morning, Yahoo's Marc Spears talked about a couple of trades that have seemingly fallen apart: Eduardo Najera to Dallas for Kris Humphries and Shawne Williams - which would have given the Nets a monopoly on player's named some variation of Sean Williams, though the player from Dallas would have been bought out. To try and open a roster spot for these players, the Nets were looking to send Josh Boone to Denver for Joey Graham.

None of this news is surprising. The Nets are a last place team with a young core and most of the players mentioned in these trade scenarios could provide a playoff-bound team with a veteran piece on a short-term contract. However, depending on what these players may bring back in a trade - and considering that most of these players, especially Alston and Simmons, are experiencing miserable seasons - they may ultimately be more valuable to keep. Because once those contracts expire this summer, it equals salary cap flexibility for the Nets in one of the best free agent markets in recent memory.

Of the rumors being floated, the Robinson/Darko trade made the most sense for the Nets, since both are young players with expiring contracts who could essentially audition for supporting roles on the team next season, or be cast away come the summer for greener free agent pastures. Boris Diaw, on the other hand, makes no sense. While he was once a nice component of those exciting Phoenix Suns "7 Seconds or Less" teams, he's also owed $9 million in each of the 2010-11 and 2011-12 seasons and is not enough of a difference maker to warrant sacrificing valuable cap space for.  Kris Humphries has a player option worth $3.2 million is not guaranteed money next year, and the Nets would have been dumping Najera, who's owed money by the Nets for two more seasons due to the absurd contract he was offered before 2008-09.

So what are the Nets options? Whereas the Nate/Darko trades sounds great on paper, common sense says the Nets are more likely to be offered a player of Diaw's ilk - a salary dump that will clog their flexibility at exactly the wrong time. Humphries is mildly interesting, as he has above average PER 40 minutes numbers, but he's known as a "shoot first" guy, with poor defense and has been turnover prone throughout his career. I don't know how he's that much of an upgrade in the frontcourt over Josh Boone. Plus it would cheat Rob Mahoney over at The Two Man Game of his weekly "Hump Day" post. But I guess if you want change for the sake of a change, he's an option.

While Kiki may have a soft spot for guys like Alston and Battie - who probably deserve better than to be rarely used bench players on a 3-30 team in their contract years, this hopefully won't lead the GM to make an ill-advised trade in an effort to make right by then. As I preached last week, the Nets need to stay true to their commitment headed into this season, even if the losses keep mounting. This rings especially true if changing directions brings the Nets a Boris Diaw type-player and contract.

 

Al Iannazzone talks about the Nets rebounding woes over at Nets Insider. NAS will also be taking a look at this later today so stay tuned: “Personally, I think it’s one, getting a body on everybody, but then it’s pursuing the ball,” Vandeweghe said. “To me, it’s a matter of desire, and you’ve got to want the ball and realize that rebounding is part of defense. The only way you get the ball back is either you get a rebound, you get a steal or the other team scores – and the last one’s not so good. So you’ve got to get rebounds.”

Talking about Courtney Lee and his shooting issues: “He’s got to become a better isolation player,” Nets president Rod Thorn said. “He has to get his shot off quicker, and there’s an adjustment there. And he needs to continue to work on his dribble-drive move. He’s good all the way to the basket, but his intermediate range is what he has to get better at — the one- or two-dribble pull-up.

Expect Jarvis Hayes back for real tonight: "He’s such a big part of our team," center Brook Lopez said. "He’s definitely one of the leaders on our team. We have been missing that leadership on the floor. Just basketball-wise, he’s a guy who can stretch the floor, really open things for us."

Marc Spears of Yahoo has some trade talk involving the Nets. First a proposed trade with Dallas offering Eduardo Najera for Kris Humphries and Shawne Williams are on "life support." It also looks like a trade deal dried up between the Nets and Denver that would have sent Josh Boone for Joey Graham. More on Nets trade talk in a few hours.

The Empire State Development Corporation talks eminent domain in Harlem today. No word on whether there will be any questions about their activity in Brooklyn.

Game 33 Video Breakdown

Posted on: January 4th, 2010 by Sebastian Pruiti 2 Comments

 

Against the Cavs in the first half, the Nets had a great first quarter.  The Nets held the Cavs to under 20 points in the first quarter and had a 7 point lead at the end of the quarter (this was the Nets biggest lead of the season after 1 quarter).  The Nets ended up losing the game in the second and third quarters though, getting outscored by 16 points in those two quarters before playing even with them in the fourth.

The Nets did a very good job on the offensive end, their ball movement looked crisp, and they were getting open looks.  But in what seems to be the theme of the Nets' season, they just couldn't knock them down.  Securing defensive rebounds were also a problem.  After the jump, we are going to look at a couple good plays and a couple bad ones, breaking them down.

... MORE →

 

I don't really like to toot my own horn...ok, that's a lie...I love to toot my own horn.  Which is why I am posting about the new basketball blog that I started, NBAPlaybook.com.  This is a NBA blog that I started that will focus more on the Xs and Os of the game, which is why I think that it will be unique.

There is a lot of stuff over there that you might be familiar with, because in all honesty, it is the same kind of stuff I do here, just with the whole NBA in mind instead of just focusing on the Nets.  I'd really appreciate it if you took the time out to check it out, and if you like it, add it to your RSS reader.

One final note, this isn't going to take away from my posting here.  I am doing this new blog because I have a fair amount of free time (being unemployed helps with that), so I don't see the new site taking away from the time I have to focus on NetsAreScorching.  I have already told Mark to kick my ass if I fall behind in my duties here, so that won't be a problem.

Again, NBAPlaybook.com!

Fan On The Couch: Episode 4

Posted on: January 4th, 2010 by Sebastian Pruiti 8 Comments

 

2nd Half Running Convo

By Tony Maglio

It’s Saturday afternoon I’m joined online by my buddy and fellow long time Nets fan, Crack.  We’re going to have a running conversation via AOL Instant Messenger for the 2nd Half of the Nets/Cavaliers game.  We’ll talk about the game as it transpires, some general Nets and NBA news and most likely touch on inside stuff that isn’t funny to anyone but us.  I had to re-download AIM just for this, and boy does it look differently than I remember.  One thing has not changed though - Crack has a very stupid avatar.

We come in at half time…

... MORE →

 

In a great read from Dave D'lessandro, he talks about the Nets and their lack of an offensive identity: It’s one thing to have balanced shot distribution, which the Nets have had of late. Since this pairing of coach and point guard (15 games), a Nets player has taken 20-plus shots only six times, and four times, he has justified it by being the team’s top scorer that night.  But it is hard to know from game to game what the Nets are trying to accomplish – especially in the last six fourth quarters, when they have averaged 21 points on .373 shooting. And with yet another offensive player (Jarvis Hayes) coming out of the trainer’s room Tuesday to play against Milwaukee, it could get more confusing yet.

Kiki Vandeweghe says his team is still learning the little things: "You have to execute the little things that you drill on every day," Vandeweghe said. "I'm talking about executing your plays, executing your defensive strategies and realizing that down the stretch you've got to [increase] focus.

Prospective Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov is hosting Russian leader Vladimir Putin at his French Alps chalet, as a thank you for clearing his name in the French prostitution scandal.

Net Income over at NetsDaily debates whether or not we're seeing the real Yi right now, or has his performance since his return from injury been an aberration: So now everyone waits to see if he’s the old Yi, the “eternal tease” as one fantasy expert called him, or the new one, the guy Nets broadcaster Tim Capstraw gushed was looking “looking like a potential all-star” in recent games. He’s played well in stretches before, but not at this level. So, it’s worth discussing: what would an aggressive, confident, productive Yi mean for the Nets?

The Atlantic Yards Report looks at the past year of progress for the project, but warns, "the arena's not a lock."

 

Per a request in the comment's section, here's a second look at yesterday's basket and foul by LeBron James towards the end of the fourth quarter. Yes, LeBron being able to shake off two Nets defenders to power to the hoop and get the hoop is impressive, but take a closer look on the second and third replays of what James does. He clearly takes stiff arms Devin Harris on the way to the hoop. Should the basket have counted?