Yesterday, I was lucky enough to be allowed to attend Panini's 2010 NBA Rookie Photo Shoot.  Over 40 rookies were in their uniforms walking around from station to station, getting their pictures taken for their first Panini basketball cards.  Media were allowed in, and I was able to grab both Derrick Favors and Damion James and talk to them for a little bit.

What really impressed me about both James and Favors is that they were both willing to talk about their weaknesses and what they needed to improve on.  I asked Favors about his defensive struggles during Summer League and what he needed to do to improve on that end, and he offered no excuses saying "Adjust to the NBA style of play.  I got called for defensive three seconds a lot so I just need to adjust to the NBA-style of defense."  When I asked how he would be able to do that, he told me "It comes with work and experience."  Favors also mentioned that he was working to improve everything, especially his strength.  Meanwhile, James told me that he was working on his ballhandling.  This is pretty important, because James played both the three and the four in college, but at the pro level he is going to play the three mostly.  He needs to be able to handle the ball a bit better than he did in college (turnover rate of 14.0 last year with Texas).  It was reassuring to see that both James and Favors are able to identify their weaknesses, come to terms with them, and be willing to do the work to improve on them.

In addition to their weaknesses, both rookies seem to be excited about building a winning team and playing for coach Avery Johnson.  As Favors told me, "He's a nice guy, and I am going to try to help build something with him."  As for Damion James, I was really interested to see what he had to say about coach Johnson because he has been mentioned as an Avery Johnson type of player.  When asked if he was excited to play with coach Johnson he said, "No doubt man.  I know he is eager to come back to coaching and he is going to try to turn the team around.  I want to be a part of that, and I look forward to it."

Finally, with the fact that most guys have seen Derrick Favors play, but haven't been able to see Damion James play too much, I asked him to describe his playing style.  "I'm a guy that's relentless.  Never let up on my opponent and try to dominate him on every play.  I go hard on both ends."  And then, to make sure he got his point across, he concluded, "I play hard."

After the jump, check out some video of both James and Favors getting their picture taken and some general thoughts/observations of the photo shoot.

... MORE →

 

Ok, ok, one more link I promise (fingers crossed). What do you expect? It's the middle of August and the team's roster is essentially set. Daily News beat guy Stefan Bondy implores the Nets to bring Carmelo Anthony to Jersey/Brooklyn. Will the DN make a web site "Get Melo.com?" Anyway, Bondy says with the Nets young core, tradeable assets and aggressive ownership, they have what it takes to trump the Knicks this summer:

If Carmelo Anthony is going to be traded and he's , as reported, the Nets are in a much better position to land him than the Knicks, or many other teams, for that matter. … Here's the caveat, however: The Nets can't mortgage their future for Anthony unless he's willing to sign an extension. So get it done with a sign-and-trade!!

 

Mike Fratello was a head coach in the NBA for 16 seasons, coaching three different teams (the Hawks, the Cavs, and the Grizzlies), and he is one of the most respected basketball minds in the game.  Currently he is an analyst for TNT, and YES calling a good amount of Nets games (he was one of the few things that made Nets' games bearable last year).  When he isn't on TV, you can find him talking about basketball either on Twitter or over at his blog (both are must reads).  Coach Fratello was kind enough to take the time out to answer a few questions about the Nets:

There aren't too many holdovers from last year's 12 win season, but the guys who are still here are pretty important (Devin Harris, Brook Lopez, and Terrence Williams).  Should these guys use last year as a learning experience and motivation, or is it best that they just put it behind them and move forward?

Any time you play an 82-game schedule you want to use that as a learning experience. You have to learn how to win. And sometimes learning how to win comes through losses. So after last season, I would think that when those three players enter training camp this Fall they will remember the pain that they went through in only having 12 wins, and that should be a motivating factor for them to get off to a better start and to wind up having a much better season than they had a year ago.

With the way the team is currently being built, in terms of the roster and coaching staff, what kind of playing style do you expect?  A half-court defensive team, or a team that can get out and run?

I think that Avery Johnson will try to establish a defensive presence at one end of the floor, and at the other end explore his transition opportunities with a guy like Devin Harris who has speed and quickness to push the ball and penetrate and get in the lane, creating shots not only for himself, but for his teammates as well. The Nets are trying to become a more athletic team. Their first round draft pick has the ability to run the floor; and the pieces that they have brought in certainly show that they are trying to become a team that can attack you in transition as well as a team that is able to score in the half-court, either with Lopez and Harris playing a center pick and roll game or through post-up opportunities with Lopez down low.
... MORE →

 

After struggling with a 12 win season last year, Nets fans are feeling good about their current situation.  A much improved roster, a successful coach, and an owner willing to spend has fans thinking about the playoffs.  We here think that the playoffs are a possibility but not a guarantee.  Over the next two weeks, we are going to look at four things that need to happen for the Nets to make the playoffs.

The Nets Will Make The Playoffs If...Brook Lopez has a 20/10 season

Why Is It Important?

Devin Harris might be the former all-star on the Nets, but without a doubt, Brook Lopez is the best player on the New Jersey Nets right now.  That is pretty impressive for a center who is entering his 3rd year in the NBA, after just recently turning 22.

So why is a 20/10 season from Brook so important?  Well, because if Brook Lopez can make himself a threat every time he touches the basketball, it opens things up all over the court.  Look at how the Orlando Magic run their offense with a 4 out and 1 in strategy.  The Magic surround Dwight Howard with 4 shooters, and dump the ball in.  Eventually teams are forced to send double teams, and that opens up shooters.  While the Nets don't have the shooters the Magic do, they have a roster that you can consider a "poor man's Orlando Magic," and that means they can have success with the 4 out and 1 in.  Brook Lopez has a better post game than Dwight (not saying that he is a better player), and that will lead to more double teams.  Lopez is a solid passer, and he will be able to find open teammates on the perimeter.

Even without the 4 out and 1 in (not sure how much it would be run...never saw Avery's Dallas teams run it), the Nets and Avery Johnson seem to be a perfect fit.  Their projected starting five isn't a team that is going to get out and run (Brook Lopez and Troy Murphy are two slower guys and Anthony Morrow isn't the most athletic player, just a spot up shooter), but that is just fine for coach Johnson.  Despite his Mavericks teams being near the bottom of the NBA when it comes to pace, his teams were always near the top when it came to offensive efficiency.  That tells me he was good in the halfcourt, mainly because of Dirk.  With the Nets, he is going to need a guy to go to in the halfcourt when the team needs a basket, and that will be Brook Lopez.  If he is able to put up 20 points with these touches, the Nets could have a successful season.

Can It Happen?

Yes, it can.  Brook Lopez put up 18.8 and 8.6 last year, while he was still raw in the post (in my opinion).  At 22, Brook still has a ton of time and potential to develop a more mature post game (right now he relies on his size and touch, and while it works, it can be stopped), and I think that development will start this upcoming season.  In addition to creating more baskets, a more fundamental post game will lead to more fouls on his opponents, sending him to the line more.  For most bigs, this would be a problem...however, for Brook this is a good thing as he has a very good stroke from the line.

Another reason why this will happen is because of the quality of his teammates have improved.  Much like how Brook's success will help his teammate, his teammates' shooting ability will help Brook.  Last year, Brook faced constant double and triple teams because there was no shooting threats on the outside.  With guys like Troy Murphy and Anthony Morrow on the court, there will be less double teams thrown in Brook's direction, meaning more room to operate.

 

I know, I know, you guys are going to rip on me for constantly talking about Carmelo Anthony when he's nearly a year from free agency and the odds of him coming to the Nets aren't that great in the first place, but deal with it.

Multiple sources were reporting last night that it looks like Anthony is going to decline Denver's extension offer and test free agency. Per the Denver Post:

These are some of the dots: He's selling his Littleton estate; the constant reports of Anthony telling friends that he wants to play for the New York Knicks; his New York wedding; his East Coast upbringing; summer trade talk that has cropped up twice in his time in Denver, which hasn't always made him feel wanted; oh, and not signing a contract that averages around $21.6 million per year for the next three years, a sizable amount of money that he may not be able to earn with a new collective bargaining agreement.

I said this in a Nets of the Round Table earlier this summer; it's essential that the Nets go out and have a respectable season this year if they want to go out and attract free agents. While it seems like some of these guys just want to pair up with other "stars" and do what Miami is doing, the Nets could go a long way in attracting guys if they play close to .500 and guys like Brook Lopez and Terrence Williams play like future stars. Fortunately, that seems to be where Mikhail Prokhorov's head is as owner.

 

I was asked to participate in the summer forecast that ESPN has been running, and I voted in all of the categories.  In addition, I was asked to write a little something about their turnaround.  You can find it here.  Mark and I should both have something up over there tomorrow, so be sure to check it out!

Monday Morning Mailbag #2

Posted on: August 16th, 2010 by Sebastian Pruiti 36 Comments

 

Day in and day out, we here at NetsAreScorching try to provide content that you guys want to read, however, we don't know what exactly you want to hear about, and some things may fall through the cracks.  This is what the mailbag is for.  Every Monday we are going to be answering questions from you the reader, don't be afraid to e-mail your questions to mailbag@netsarescorching.com.

The first edition of the Monday mailbag was so successful that we decided to do it again and turn it into a weekly feature.  Today, we are going to talk about Rod Thorn to the Sixers, Troy Murphy coming to the Nets, the playoffs, and Brook Lopez's contract.  Onto the questions...

Keenan Milbourne

What's up with Rod Thorn going to the Sixers???  Something's fishy.  Making me  really start thinking that something went down between him and the owner.  Can  you expound?  Please?????

I was totally expecting for Thorn to take another job, mainly because when Rod Thorn announced he was leaving, he made sure to mention that he wasn't "retiring."  I think that the way that Prokhorov and Avery Johnson wanted to build the team was different than what Rod Thorn wanted to do, and that lead to his departure.  Thorn probably wanted to conserve cap space going into the new CBA instead of building a team that can compete for the playoffs (If Thorn was still around, the Murphy trade doesn't go down).  I don't think there was any animosity, and as NetsDaily reported, Prokhorov worked hard to keep Thorn, but it was just a difference of opinion.  Was I surprised that he signed with the Sixers?  At first, yes because there weren't any rumors or anything like that.  However, when you take a closer look, it does make sense.

Jesse Voremberg

Hey NAS,

Brook Lopez is essentially guaranteed to be with us through the   2011-12 season, and then he has a 4.1 million qualifying offer for   2012-13.  There is no doubt in my mind (unless of course some disaster   happens) that the Nets need to resign Lopez with a long contract   extension, perhaps for another 5-6 years.  Do you think the Nets,   under the new management and ownership, will extend however much money   is necessary to retain Lopez before he is a FA?  If so, what would this contract look like?

This is going to be something to look out for.  It is so hard to say what will it take to keep Brook in New Jersey because of how up in the air the CBA is.  Rumor has it that owners want less money and years to be the max, and if that happens it will change the value of just about every player in the NBA.

While the exact numbers/years up in the air, I totally expect the Nets to be willing to do whatever it takes to sign Brook Lopez.  He just recently turned 22, and put up 18.8 points and 8.6 rebounds a game in just his second season.  He is still pretty raw (at least in the low post) and I think he has a chance to put up a 20/10 season.  Big men like Brook are few and far in between and I think the Nets' front office realizes that.

... MORE →

 

It's Deja Vu all over again. Last year around this team, I was talking about how LeBron James was going to be a free agent but he would never leave Cleveland, and if he did, it was doubtful he would come to the Nets. Then the Nets were bought by a Russian billionaire who aggresively said he wanted to win it all and five years and LeBron decided to take his "talents to South Beach" to hang out with his friends for  a few years to see if he could finally do what he couldn't do on his own in Cleveland.

So now the debate rages on with Carmelo Anthony. Denver has put an extension on the table, and the longer Melo goes without taking it, the more you have to think he's going to test free agency next summer. And like LeBron, the Knicks are already considering themselves front runners, though as a Brooklyn native, I personally think the Nets should be in that conversation more. But what does Melo say when asked about all that?:

“Obviously everybody knows that I’m loyal to the Denver community and to the Denver Nuggets. I’ve shown that over my seven-year stint here. I don’t think nobody can question that,” Anthony said during a break at his annual basketball camp. “But at this point in time, I’ve got to do what’s best for me and my family. If it’s taking my time, figuring out if I want to take that extension or not, then that’s what I’ve got to do.”

Yeah, where have I heard this all before?

 

Obviously, this is a New Jersey Nets blog, however, the NAS crew absolutely love the NBA in general. So, every week, Sebastian, Mark, Devin, and myself will answer questions regarding the L.

1) Is Darren Collison the PG answer the Pacers have been looking? Project his production for next season.

Sebastian: Yes, he is going to be the answer for the Pacers.  He turned the ball over a ton last year, even for a rookie, but with the Pacers determined to move T.J. Ford, this is going to be Collison's show to run the entire year, good or bad.  He will struggle early on, but during the end of the season and two years from now, he will shine.

Mark: Collison was quite the pleasant surprise last season for NOLA and I'm shocked that they got rid of him with the Chris Paul situation so precarious. I think he's going to be a huge plus for Indy. Predicting his number is tough business, but if he starts every day as expected, I can easily see a 16 and 8 season from him.

Devin: I think so. I'm not really sure how he fits in Indiana's offense (since I flat-out don't know much about Indiana's offense in the first place), but he was certainly very exciting and turned a lot of heads when CP3 was out and he's always been known as a talented asset. However, he seemed to be playing too fast for his own good a lot of the time - my guess is that it was due to the pressure of being Chris Paul's replacement. If he can control the ball a little more effectively - it's hard to forget his near-triple double of 25 points, 9 assists, and 10 turnovers - chances are he can make a big splash in Indiana.

DV: I'm a huge fan of Collison and definitely think he's the PG answer for the Pacers.  He's quick, has excellent court vision, and can play defense.  No matter the personnel around him, it's hard not to have his talent mesh with any offense unless Larry Brown is running it or it's the triangle offense which isn't as friendly to point  guards.  I think it's a good move for Larry Bird and the Pacers and think Collison will average 17 and 8.... MORE →

 

Former Nets President Rod Thorn was introduced yesterday as President of the Philadelphia 76ers stunning many around the league who didn't realize Thorn would be so quick to take on a new job after mysteriously leaving the Nets last month.

Thorn continues to say there's no ill will towards his old team and there are no nefarious reasons for his leaving:

"I was never retired," Thorn said Thursday. "I just retired with the Nets."

Still seems like something is up to me. And the timing of Thorn's announcement couldn't have been worse. So I wish him well, but not the best if that makes sense.

***

In other news, earlier this week, I ripped on SI's Chris Mannix for giving the Nets a C- in his off-season report primarily because they weren't doing enough to conserve cap space. My point was that after the signings of Travis Outlaw, Jordan Farmar, Johan Petro and Anthony Morrow, the Nets still had a ton of financial flexibility while only barely passing the NBA mandated threshold for minimum team salary.
Totally expecting my opinion to enter the void of the interwebs, I was shocked to see a response from Mannix yesterday. For starters, I give total kudos to Chris for addressing my criticism publicly and not dismissing it as the rantings of some mouth breathing superfan. However, after reading his defense, I still think his argument has major holes:

My problem isn't the money; it is the number of years over which the money is being paid. You want to give Petro $3.5 million per year? Fine. I mean, you have to wonder why the Nuggets, who were practically ready to hold open tryouts for a big man most of the summer, weren't interested in re-signing him, but whatever. You want to hand Outlaw $7 million annually? The Blazers traded him and the Clippers weren't in any rush to bring him back, but I'll buy that too. And $4 million on average for Farmar? Sure, go ahead.

It's the lengths of the contracts that are ridiculous. Five years for Outlaw. Three for Petro and Farmar. It's true, none of these contracts put the Nets over the cap, and with newly acquired Troy Murphy and Kris Humphries coming off the books next season, New Jersey will likely have $20-plus million to spend.

But when you are rebuilding a team from the ground up, maintaining as much financial flexibility as possible is the key.

I get it, and in a vacuum, Mannix is right, but the problem is, in this bizarre off-season where guys like Drew Gooden and Darko Milicic were getting crazy deals, who were these players being signed for 1-2 year deals that would have also kept the Nets mildly competitive? The Nets could have went out and signed a bunch of D-Leaguers to 1-year deals and then they would have been dealing with the min. salary threshold again. They could have traded the last of their assets for a bunch of expiring contracts and then be faced with the same problem with rebuilding an entire roster next summer.

At the end of the day, after the Troy Murphy deal, the Nets are going to have more than enough money off the books to procure a game changing player via free agency next summer while also having 8 players from this year's roster still under contract with experience playing together. The Nets missed out on their superstar, but have gone out and acquired a batch of young players who seem to tie-in to a specific system so they can grow together and be ready for the day that the Nets CAN acquire a superstar either via trade or free agency. I'm comfortable with this style of team building and I just don't see how Mannix sees this as spending for spending sake. If he gave the Nets a C- and left it at the Nets whiffed on the big FAs and didn't get the #1 pick, there's no arguments for me. But by trying to add some depth to his reporting, I feel Mannix is still exposing his lack of insight about the Nets' specific situation - which is understandable with many of these national writers who are paid to follow the Celtics, Lakers and Heat, not the Nets.

 

On Wednesday afternoon, the Houston Rockets, New Orleans Hornets, Indiana Pacers, and New Jersey Nets pulled off a four-team blockbuster, swapping several key contributors.Rahat Huq of Red94, Ryan Schwan of Hornets247, Tim Donahue of 8 points, 9 seconds, and Sebastian Pruiti of Nets are Scorching got together to provide assessments of the outgoing players from their respective ballclubs.

Rahat Huq (Red94) on Trevor Ariza: I’ve written a comprehensive series of essays on Trevor Ariza entitled ‘Assessing Ariza,’ evaluating his strengths, weaknesses, and player potential.  (Parts 1, 2, and 3)

In short, he’s an ideal role-player who thrives off the ball, spotting up or using his superior athleticism to slash to the basket.  Now having the benefit of playing next to Chris Paul, I expect Ariza to return to form from his playoff run with the Lakers – he really took off after the acquisition of Kevin Martin; Ariza is at his best playing next to dominant players.

If you’re hoping Trevor will grow into his physical gifts and emerge as a primary option, you’re going to be disappointed.  While a capable ball-handler against light pressure, he doesn’t have the handles to create for himself off the dribble.  He also has extremely poor footwork and body control.  Even worse, Ariza has an oddly inflated sense of entitlement–possibly due to his Lakers pedigree–leading him to force bad shots and make poor decisions; Ariza struggles when needing to think on the basketball court.

The issue of Ariza’s defense is a contentious one.  His reputation precedes him, but his is a reckless, instinctual approach, garnering him gaudy steals totals but often leaving his teammates scrambling to rotate after blown coverage.  Still, this manner can be conducive to forcing tempo if that’s your cup of tea.

All in all, assuming expectations remain reasonable, I think the Hornets will be very pleased next year with Trevor Ariza.  While his struggles with the Rockets are well documented, playing next to Chris Paul is a situation tailor-made for a player of Trevor’s skillset and abilities – in returning to his former role with the Lakers (next to a superstar guard), I think Trevor will really thrive.

Ryan Schwan (Hornets247) on Darren Collison: After watching him for a season, I’m comfortable claiming that Darren Collison is the proud owner of the “fastest man in the NBA” title.   When he played, the Hornets pace increased by five posessions, as he exploded up court every chance he could.  Considering the heavy-footed players he was dragging with him up the court, it is a pretty amazing feat.

Collison started off his rookie season pretty rough, shooting poorly from deep, and struggling valiantly to figure out how to score over the faster, taller atheletes he met in the paint.  In fact, for the first month, a pick and roll run by Collison typically had very little going for it.  That all changed, however, when Chris Paul went down.  Given long minutes, constant coaching by Paul, and confidence that never seemed to waver, Collison started deploying a stutter step and mid-range pull up jumper that made him deadly on the pick and roll by the end of February.  His long-range shot, which was amazing in college, began to settle in, and soon he was deadly from three, both as a spot-up shooter, and as a guy who could pull up off the dribble and knock it down.

As a passer, Collison is excellent in the open court, solid at the pick and roll, but tends to struggle in the pick and pop.  He’s great at driving into the paint and laying the ball off to a big man for a dunk or finding the roller, but when he has to find the open men on the perimeter, he still struggles.  As a result, though he gets a lot of assists, he also gets a lot of turnovers.  He also has the tendency to be called for a carry once or twice a game, though that was fading by the end of last season.

Defensively is where Collison has his biggest problems.  He makes Allen Iverson look fat – and unlike mighty mouse Chris Paul, he’s also  not physically strong at all.  That leaves him to be exploited terribly in post ups last year, and because of his lightness, a good screen or series of screens can take him out the picture on defense despite his recovery speed.

As a team leader, Collison was remarkable.  He was barking commands to veterans like Okafor and David West from the start of the season.  On more than one occassion I saw him get on teammates for not being where they were supposed to be.  He’s intelligent, knows how to get a team into its offense, and it shows.  He’s also cold-blooded.  He had two game-winning shots last season, and another three that put a nail in a run the other team was making to come back.  He doesn’t shy from that big shot – and he has a decent track record of making it.

In the end, I feel Collison will be an exciting-as-hell, explosive scorer in the mold of Tony Parker, and most nights will outscore his opponent.  At the same time, I’d also expect his opponent to regularly score more than is usual.

Tim Donahue (8 points, 9 seconds) on Troy Murphy:

Offensively – The short answer is that Murph is a 6?11? Steve Kerr.  He is an extremely efficient scorer, and serves as a safety valve for the offense.  I can see him being a very nice player with your personnel, offensively, as he is a low-usage guy.  The Pacers use him to float at the top of the key, and he took all but like 10 of his three’s from the arc (very few corner threes).  He has no post game to speak of, and he’s a solid passer, but not a great high post guy.  He does a good job of reading his defender, and is very good at reading the closeout, putting the ball on the floor and finishing at the rim.  He doesn’t get many offensive rebounds because of (a) where he plays and (b) his lack of footspeed, but could get more if he played closer to the basket.  However, I think you’d be an absolute fool to play him – offensively – in any other way than the way O’Brien used him.  Look at his eFG and TS numbers the last three years under Obie vs. his time in GS.  He plays completely within his skill set (almost to a fault), and I have never – never – seen a guy with better shot selection than Troy.  Very, very nice complementary shooter to have on your team.

Defensively – He is definitely a liability, and that is because he’s slow and physically weak. He gets lots of defensive rebounds, but he doesn’t really control the glass the way most guys who pull down the volume of boards he gets.  He is not a block out guy, but has a good nose for the ball.  One-on-one he will never be better than, well, bad, but he can learn and will follow team defensive concepts.  In other words, if the opponent decides to target him, then he’ll get beaten, but he won’t blow defensive team schemes.  Overall, your team’s defensive performance will drag when he’s on the floor.

Lockerroom & Fit – He appears likable enough, but not really a presence.  Seems to get along with everybody well enough.  There were rumors last year that he wasn’t happy about Hansbrough eating into his playing time, but they were way external to the organization and I never believed them.  As far as fitting with your big guys, he should be a great fit with both Lopez and Favors offensively, and probaly a poor fit defensively with Lopez, but pretty good with Favors – assuming I’ve got a reasonable handle on their respective games.

Here’s the most important part – you can’t look at the 14 & 11 and think he’s that traditional double-double guy.  He is very much someone who accentuates his positives, but doesn’t improve on his negatives.  He is not a physical player, at all.  He is who he is, but that can be a good thing.  Assuming Avery doesn’t choke on his defense, I suspect he’ll love the guy because he is perhaps the most reliably consistent player I’ve seen in three+ decades of watching the NBA.  He will hit shots, he will get some boards, and he will suck on defense. He will score, but he is a safety valve – not a primary or secondary option.  It sounds strange, but I think coaches like that because it’s something they don’t have to worry about. They put him out there, and work on everything else.   This is why he can have some big games and not really make a difference.  He’s kind of a like an offensive lineman.  He can have a great  individual game, but if the rest of the line sucks, it won’t matter.  At the same time, if he’s great and the rest of the line is great, nobody will notice him.

Sebastian Pruiti (Nets are Scorching) on Courtney Lee:Courtney Lee is a guy I like and with Avery Johnson coming to New Jersey, I thought he was the perfect Avery Johnson guy.  He shoots the three ok (last years numbers are too low for his shooting ability in my honest opinion), he can penetrate and get out and run, but where he is most valuable is on the defensive end.  Courtney is both a very good one on one and team defender, and he works very hard on that end.  Lee doesn’t have a high ceiling  (and that is why I suspect that the Nets held onto Terrence Williams), and the player he is now is the player he will be years from now.  That’s not a bad thing, but there is very little room for him to grow.

 

Transcript after the jump.

... MORE →