Things Done Changed: Why The Nets Are Better Under P.J. Carlesimo

Posted on: January 23rd, 2013 by Devin Kharpertian 7 Comments

4. Rotations.

P.J. Carlesimo, MarShon Brooks

(AP/Kathy Kmonicek)

Near the end of Avery Johnson's tenure, Johnson threw out lineup combination after lineup combination for one to two minutes at a time, hoping to see something that would "stick" without waiting around to see how it stuck. In Johnson's final two games as Nets coach -- both blowout losses -- he used 17 and 20 lineups, respectively; only one for longer than 10 minutes in a game and 19 of them (more than half) for less than 90 seconds.

Under P.J. Carlesimo, the rotations are a little tighter: the best lineup will often get 15-25 minutes of playing time in a game, and other than in rapid-fire substitution mode late in crunch time, the Nets won't see too many lineups that only get seconds together. Just look at the last game against New York: Carlesimo used only 11 lineups, and three of them came in that last minute of offense-defense switching in a late-game situation. The starters played 20 minutes together, and four other lineups played stretches of four or more minutes.

Bench players have a longer leash. MarShon Brooks has had some of his best games under Carlesimo, and openly said that the game, and the team, felt different. Mirza Teletovic, the fifth big in the rotation, has had an opportunity to miss three-pointers before making them. There are only so many minutes to go around -- and with Kris Humphries looking back to form now, even less -- but the starters are playing more minutes together, the bench players are getting chances, substitutions aren't coming every 90 seconds, and quite suddenly, this team has found a rhythm.

Last: 100% Brook Lopez

7 comments
M I K E
M I K E

Reading Devin's posts are like going to Basketball College. Great analysis once again Professor DK.

Mike Grand
Mike Grand

This article is spot on. We went from a below average defensive team to an above average defensive team under PJ - that's a HUGE change. More importantly, we've been much better on offense. I think you could've emphasized the change in offense a little more. There are definitely more pick and rolls but more importantly - there are less post ups/isolations and we push the pace a lot more. We were dead last in pace under Avery - we've been creeping up a bit since PJ took over. It's led to more blow outs and a much better flow on offense. It's no coincidence that when you put one of the best Pick and Roll PGs and Cs in more PnRs - that good things happen. Also on rotations - just to add to what you said - PJ seems to REALLY make an effort to find a unit that's working. If Hump plays badly, he doesn't hesitate to bring Teletovic in the game. If Stack struggles, he brings in Marshon. When Mirza and Hump struggled, he went to Gerald Wallace as the back up 4. Players prefer to have very set roles but we have 5 bigs worthy of playing time - so it's just not going to happen. The sad part is PJ hasn't done anything OUT OF THIS WORLD - he's made very basic offensive/defensive/philosophical adjustments and it's made a huge difference.

PJ Velez
PJ Velez

Just one thing: Great article title!!!

Max Weisberg
Max Weisberg

With the defense, I think that the change is very simple; MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. Something Avery NEVER did, and it killed us, especially in the blowout to the Knicks. Never knew how to adjust to Chandler PnR and it was embarrassing. PJ knows how to make adjustments. Definitely spot on with the PnR. I was always so frustrated when Avery refuse to run a single one. It's the toughest play to defend and it the most efficient play in basketball.

kenji
kenji

you are looking into this WAY too deeply!! from my talks with a previous Nets player ,who was a star elsewhere but got little playing time under Avery--was that the players HATED Johnson and this clearly showed in their lack of enthusiasm after 1 month of play this year someone within the nets brass told me at a game last week that the team just tuned Avery out!! as former Nets coach from the 90s,Butch Beard told me years ago--the goal is to get your guys to give up their individual goals and fit into the plans to win as a team--extrapolating this comment to Avery--he had no clue how to motivate his players in a Positive way--you dont get anywhere for berating or yanking players out for every mistake!!it doesnt succeed in summary,in contrast to what the article says by Mr. Devin--it turns out very simple--the players just hated to play for Avery Johnson and wanted him out as coach!!!