Rod Thorn or Billy King. J-Kidd or D-Will. Which offseason was better. Take into account all the moves of both offseasons from the Draft to the beginning of the season.
I will go with the 2001 offseason move by move. Dealing for Jefferson and Collins in the draft was an absolute steal, and of course, the Jason Kidd trade turned the team into 2 time conference champs. The Johnson trade was great as far as getting Deron to stay but the measuring stick is really high here.
-
This reply was modified 6 months, 3 weeks ago by
jsalkin1.
For now, I do have to go 2001. The Nets went from 26-56 to back to back finals trips. And put together a younger team than this one. I think this one will have more longevity because ownership is more committed, but I believe that offseason, in a vacuum, exceeds this one at the moment.
Yeah I figure for now the 2001 year will have the advantage of already having results. This one can have more longevity because we don’t have the Rat coming in to blow up the team
What more needs to be said other than……..
In the 2001 offseason, Nets got rid of Stephon Marbury.
WynnDuffy: in the 2012 offseason, the Nets got rid of Johan Petro.
Devin, would you like to compare the two, team impact-wise?
The thing with the 2012 offseason is the Nets created a team that ruled the east for 2 years, then nearly a third.
Which two years will those be?
2001-2002 and 2002-2003 the years they won the East.
